December 19, 2001
Rivera, Fox ripped by rivals over war coverage Is it Geraldo bashing — or Fox bashing? A
peeved press has accused Fox News Channel correspondent Geraldo Rivera of false
reporting, warmongering and questionable antics during his assignment in
Afghanistan. But the discord may run deeper.
Mr. Rivera has not cried on camera yet, as CBS'
Dan Rather did back in September. But he has carried a pistol, rolled in the
sand, sported a suede bush hat and offered his portrayal of Geraldo as
Hemingway, of he-man reportage, rife with guts, glory and meaningful pauses.
Even his own cameraman (cameramen, who can't fake anything, are the real
captains of derring-do) said, "They don't make a helmet big enough for his
head."
Bombast notwithstanding, critics have questioned
Mr. Rivera's credibility, both for the content of his dispatches and his
decision to carry a gun in a war zone. The chorus includes CBS and ABC, a hint
that the old unwritten rules of civility among broadcast competitors are
eroding. Things are getting personal. (The newspaper and magazine
correspondents, who generally regard the TV journalists as more entertainers
than reporters, anyway, take a more bemused view of the contretemps).
"Fox News correspondent Geraldo Rivera, who
couldn't bear being away from the action in Afghanistan, was hundreds of miles
from the site of a friendly fire incident he reported on," CBS noted in a
story, posted on its Web site yesterday, captioned "Where's Geraldo?
Nowhere near site of U.S. casualties, as he claimed."
Indeed, on Dec. 6, Mr. Rivera told his viewers he
was in Kandahar, on the "hallowed" spot where three Americans had been
killed the day before. But Baltimore Sun television columnist David Folkenflik
called him on it, eventually getting Mr. Rivera to concede via satellite phone
that he had been to the north in Tora Bora — confused, he said, "by the
fog of war."
Some of his critics weighed in. National Public
Radio called it "a firing offense" while ABC suggested, "You'd
want to correct any mistake immediately."
A Poynter Institute analyst said, "Geraldo
Rivera and Fox News owe their viewers a substantive explanation of what this
means, journalistically and ethically."
Fox dismisses it all. "Geraldo has 'fessed up
to his mistake. This is simply the Sun's attempt to advance a story which was
already dead on arrival," said a Fox News Channel spokesman yesterday.
Canny viewers had much to say as well.
"Liberals eat themselves and each other," wrote one observer at news
Web site www.lucianne.com yesterday. "This is more attempting to bash Fox
News than anything else."
Mr. Rivera has caught flak, meanwhile, for
carrying a gun, an act that might be misinterpreted as hostile in war-torn
Afghanistan and endanger the lives of other correspondents.
But guns fit the Fox News image, at least
according to Vanity Fair's James Wolcott, who recently wrote, "Geraldo
Rivera and the Viagra posse at Fox News refilled their gas bags and began taking
turns on Mussolini's balcony to exhort the mob."
When asked to elaborate on CNN, Mr. Wolcott said,
"They're doing everything but renting their own helicopters and, you know,
firing rockets."
Not all is acrimonious, however. A bemused Terry
Eastland of the Weekly Standard noted that Mr. Rivera appeared — unnoticed and
uncredited — in full cowboy-correspondent regalia in the background of a
photograph by Kevin Frayer of the Canadian Press, featured prominently in
Monday's editions of The Washington Post.
"Who can believe the editors at the Post
foreign desk failed to see Geraldo?" Mr. Eastland asked yesterday.
"The war on terrorism is deadly serious. Diversions are few," Mr.
Eastland wrote. "Kevin Frayer has — with or without Geraldo's help —
provided one."